Does anyone know if the XReal Beam Pro used as a Standalone 3D camera … performs better in terms of image quality, than the Fuji W3 or the Qoocam Ego ?
Also, is the aspect ratio of the 3d photos taken by the Beam Pro, 16:9??
1 Like
Xreal Beam Pro has separation of 50 millimetres. Fuji W3 has 75 millimitres. Ego has similar spacing to Fuji.
Beam Pro has very wide angle lens, designed primarily to go with their VR glasses. I’ve been using it successfully with my old LG 3D television, sometimes with cropping in Stereo Photo Maker, sometimes without any cropping.
Fuji W3 has inferior quality if you are just looking at specifications. But in bright daylight, the Fuji W3 still looks very nice to my eyes.
Qoocam Ego does not do contrast well, and the colour balance is not quite right.
Beam Pro also does not do contrast well. But it’s a lot of fun to use. It’s native photo aspect ratio is 4:3. I frequently crop to 16:9 to make it look nice on my 3D television.
Beam Pro also does 3D video very well at 1080p up to 60 frames per second.
Everything I’ve taken on the Xreal Beam Pro has come up looking great on my Lume Pad 2.
2 Likes
Superb!
Andrew, l can’t thankyou enough for taking the time to reply and in particular, highlighting and explaining the differences with the 3d cameras.
This is so, so very helpful to me and to so many others … and is extremely appreciated!
THANKYOU very much !!!